Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now
Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now
| Blogs > 40Deuce > Sherry Stringfield's ass in 93 |
Surfs up space ponies, I'm making gravy without the lumps!
|
Surfs up space ponies, I'm making gravy without the lumps! In the episode of the Office "Phyllis's Wedding" very briefly you see Toby's date to the titular wedding. I was curious who this very attractive lady is so I scoured the internet and discovered two things . One that no one knows who she is and two that a lot of people really want to know who she is. Even in this day and age there are still mysteries. Later in the show when it wasn't good anymore the Toby character was turned into an annoying sad-sack, but this was still the good years of the show when the joke was that outside of Dunder Mifflin Toby's life was pretty good and it was only there due to Micheal's insane hatred that he had issues. I found out that what I'm doing on my other blog is called "flash fiction". Another name for it is "dribble" which I prefer because it sounds like drivel and dribble just sounds gross on its own anyway. There's a lot of talk these days about how people identify. I've thought a lot about it and I have decided. I may be a 41 year old chunk-monster with a slightly lazy eye but I am going to identify as sexy lady wearing cut off shorts, a bikini top, one fingerless glove carrying a film reel canister.  This is me now. If you say it isn't you are not woke as fuck. Sometimes when I joke about how people identify it seems wrong. But then again I also kind of feel like that's a sign that things are okay. Such as not that long ago you couldn't really joke about someone being gay because you know there was awful discrimination, but now there's just a little discrimination (probably not true and saying that makes me an asshole) so it seems okay to make a few jokes. We all agree that the US legal system is broken and accomplishes nothing and anyone involved with it is awful but that doesn't mean that it can't be fixed. What I'm thinking is that we adopt a system of trial by spider. We'll call up Rick Morranis and get that machine he built from Honey I Shrunk the - it's a little known fact he actually made such a device after filming that movie - and when someone is accused of a crime we'll shrink them down and have them fight a spider live on TBS. If they die obviously the situation is resolved, if they win they're free. Now , and this is important, trial by spider does NOT decide if the person is guilty or not - because that's impossible - it merely decides if that person is punished. You see that's the real issue with most legal systems - they're premised on figuring out if the person did something bad or not. That's too hard. Just decided if they should be punished. I'm also considering trial by stone - which is not what you think. 'The right to<b> privacy </font></b>is a personal and fundamental right protected by the United States Constitution.' This is the first line in MANY state data<b> privacy </font></b>laws. But is it true? Although the Constitution does not explicitly include the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has found that the Constitution implicitly grants a right to<b> privacy </font></b>against governmental intrusion from the First Amendment, Third Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment. So I guess it's kind of true? I'm not quite sure what the 1st amendment means from a<b> privacy </font></b>perspective - I guess that you're allowed to keep your religion private. Or maybe it's about anonymous free speech? Not sure. The third amendment makes some sense - your home is private in the sense that soldiers can't come in there and just make themselves at home. But that's somewhat tenuous if you ask me, seems more like a property rights thing. The 4th amendment seems mostly clear - the stuff you have is private. Mostly. The 5th amendment is clearly about privacy, although I often forget there's a lot of other stuff in there beyond the right to not incriminate yourself. Some of the amendments are a real hodgepodge. But all of these things are about<b> privacy </font></b>from the government. I don't see that the Constitution gives us a right to<b> privacy </font></b>from other people or most importantly from all knowing, all seeing , all powerful corporate megalords. However I don't know why it matters. If a state wants people to have<b> privacy </font></b>why do they need to invoke the Constitution? They can pass whatever laws they want - kind of. What's to be gained by bringing the Constitution into it? I remember reading one time that the US Constitution is the best Constitution because it has the least amendments. Which seems like a weird argument. And also something that is 100% American. I wonder what happened to make this country obsessed with claiming to be the best all time. If America was a person no one would be friends with it - can you imagine someone who just talks about how great they are constantly? If countries were people what country would be your best friend and why? Putting first by putting employees first, immediately after prioritizing fiscal responsibilities and leveraging profitability towards exceeding by empowering our employees to put (and themselves) first, in a diverse and respectful environment of only those that come first, first. |
||||
|
Now THAT’s a 40Deuce hypothetical question I can get behind. I choose France. A little bit snooty and intellectual. Loves great food and makes a several hour production out of the evening meal. Respects bicyclists and doesn’t try to run them over. The stereotype about not using deodorant is problematic though.... Second best friend, New Zealand, friendly and outdoorsy.   
|
Become a member to create a blog
