Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now

Scary Enough For You?  

MissAnnThrope 63F
7711 posts
11/3/2006 4:50 am

Last Read:
2/21/2007 8:42 am

Scary Enough For You?

Halloween has passed, but in Brooklyn, the controversy rages. Is it about knocking on doors of molesters? Nope. Is it about poisoned candy? Nope. It's about a high school student's costume.

Halloween is supposed to be scary. Traditionally, and adults dress as monsters, ghouls, werewolves, ghosts, witches and the ilk. These are all acceptable. But what of real life monsters? Is it inappropriate to dress as one?

They're saying yes in Manhattan Beach, an area of Brooklyn. Where Walter Petryk, an honor student, decided to show up for Halloween dressed as Hitler. No one was amused. Did I mention he goes to Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences?

Petryk says he has the right to free expression under the first amendment. He also said he was dressed as Hitler as a satire. He held a news conference the next day, where he said, "I'm not a Nazi. It's a Halloween costume. People have taken it too seriously . . . I'm not going to go around and kill Jews or anything."

While it might have been a Halloween costume, he knew the trouble it would cause. On is way to school, he disguised his costume with an overcoat and bowler, so people would think he was dressed as Charlie Chaplin. One of his friends even told him he was going to get beaten up for wearing such a costume and then kicked him.

The head of the PTA at the school is organizing a protest. On Monday, students will be marching from the school to the Holocaust Memorial Park in Sheepshead Bay. Because you know, the is all for genocide. Petryk is also facing a 10 day<b> suspension </font></b>for being politically incorrect. The Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee are calling the costume hate speech. They compared it to the Ku Klux Klan. Funny, I don't remember any of them protesting when Mel Brooks dressed up as Hitler. As a matter of fact, that's who the had in mind when he dressed that way.

His step father said so. His step father, Harold Bloom is Jewish and had relatives die in the Holocaust. He said, at first he was "very disturbed" by the costume choice. But he went on to say, "If he had wanted to advocate my genocide, I wouldn't have allowed (the costume). "That wasn't the spirit in which he was doing this at all. He was doing it in the spirit of Monty Python and Mel Brooks."

Notice no one says it's in the spirit of Cartman. Of course, then he would be advocating genocide. He also would have had to have worn a fat suit.

I personally think Hitler is one of the scariest Halloween costumes anyone could wear. It even tops a Karl Rove mask. Or 12 year old girls dressed as hookers. Oh sorry, they dress that way most days, as they do their best to emulate Paris Hilton and the Pussycat Dolls.

But what do you all think? Are there sensitivity limits to how scary you can be for Halloween?


TechSteve 56M

11/3/2006 6:08 am

It is illegal in Germany to wear such a costume.

You are not even allowed to display a swastika I believe anywhere in public.

I dont know about other countries surrounding Germany.

I say leave him alone.

It is halloween and it is only one day.

There have been movies, comedy shows such as Hogans Heroes, and I even have a computer game that takes place in World War II Germany that is full of Nazi stuff. I am sure that game is available in the US too.

Steve


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:12 am:
Yet in a number of cultures, from Hindu to Hopi, the swastika is a symbol of luck. It was used by the Third Reich because of its historic symbolism. In a few short years, they attached all sorts of negative connotations to an ancient symbol.

AmericanBaroness 59F

11/3/2006 6:36 am

My point about same as Zara's -- INTENT. Steve mentioned a show; I luv Hogan's Heroes. Did you know that the man who played the French prisoner was actually a survivor of the Holocaust? The man who played Col. Klink was a classically trained Shakesperian actor amongst other things. Just a couple of the show's 'in jokes'.

I've battled stupidity over being German, countless times being called Nazi; of course the morons have no clue that that is a political party -- I'm Independent and even then don't vote party lines, I vote for the person and what they stand for.

I have a movie called Shining Through, in which the main plot is based on that time in history and much is acted as if it was set in Germany itself -- so I should burn it? What about Schindler's List? That wasn't totally sympathetic to the Jewish community, because it did strive to show a lot of different aspects.

Well before I hijack I'll put my splint back on. Just wanted to drop in. Oh, and I did the dick size/tit size post, since you were busy! Later....


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:21 am:
Isn't "Shining Through" that Melanie Griffith movie?

This guy's intent was not to spread hate, although, the fact he pretended he was dressed as Charlie Chaplin on the subway shows he knew it would cause trouble. I do think his actual intent was to push the envelope.

AmericanBaroness 59F

11/3/2006 6:39 am

Oh and one more thing {yeah I know} -- these 'outraged' people remind me of those before/after 9-11...where was their patriotism, their spirit, their moral convictions, their flags, etcetera...BEFORE? It must be 'nice' to only be outraged on alternate Fridays of a month, schedule permitting or whatever....


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:22 am:
Good point. No one was hanging flags on their cars before 9/11. To me, it was a phony show of patriotism, not to mention many of these shows were in direct violation of the Flag Code.

papyrina 58F
21123 posts
11/3/2006 6:39 am

tasteless and thoughtless and he obviously knew what he was doing, a good swift kick should do the trick,but all the other protesting and complaining is well over the top.

Yep in germany its illegal and in England last year prince harry got a right royal telling off for wearing it.

Holocaust denial is also a crime here


I'm a

and
i'm here to stay


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:24 am:
Prince Harry went to a party where the theme was colonialists and natives. He went as Rommel, otherwise known as The Desert Fox and the head of Germany's Afrika Corp. I wonder what the press would have done had he gotten out the shoe polish, darkened his face and went as a native.

rm_DaphneR 65F
8019 posts
11/3/2006 7:22 am

Maybe he should have kept the overcoat and bowler on, walked around saying "sieg heil" and told people he was Charlie Chaplin pretending to be Hitler. They probably wouldn't have said a word.

Have tongue, will use it. Repeatedly.


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:31 am:
Well, he always could have claimed he was Chaplin playing Hitler from "The Great Dictator." He just would have confused everyone then.

rm_goddess1946 113F
13513 posts
11/3/2006 7:41 am

I think there is a fine line and he crossed it. The scariest thing here is his mindset...neither funny nor even mildly amusing in my book...fun is fun... To take that to that school was just plain cruel.

Just a little food for thought.............
If you really want to be happy, nobody can stop you...
{=}


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:37 am:
He's also in a city where the stage production of "The Producers" has been playing for the past five years and posters for it are still everywhere. Where some NY cable station still shows reruns of "Hogan's Heros" every night. However, considering his area of Brooklyn, the costume was not a good idea.

Gossip_Anyone 48F

11/3/2006 9:20 am

didn't prince charle's younger son dress up as him a few years back and got booed by the photogs?


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:45 am:
Prince Harry dressed as Rommel, as the theme was colonialists and natives. It caused a lot of trouble, even though the British didn't really consider Rommel a devil during his time as head of the Afrika Corp. Rommel was named in a plot to try to overthrow Hitler and was basically forced by Hitler to commit suicide by cyanide.

cockeyedoptmist 64M

11/3/2006 1:07 pm

He is a boy and a goy and a goy boy can make silly mistakes when they are growing up. Prince Henry made the same mistake not long go at a fancy dress party, with similar results.

I'm damm glad that he didnt go as Andy Kaufman.


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 1:55 am:
I still think he should have worn a Mel Gibson mask with the costume. Now that would have been funny.

haversack_smith 47M
6189 posts
11/3/2006 2:56 pm

I'm glad to hear that "Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences" has so few problems that this can be such a major issue for them.

This is just so ridiculous. Why do these people care if some kid dresses up as Hitler? After over fifty years of dramatic and comedic portrayals, who'd have thought Hitler's image had any shock-value left? Yes, the Nazi regime committed terrible atrocities and I'm not denying that for a moment. But this kid isn't glorifying them. The stepdad sounds like he's got his head screwed on straight, which is more than can be said for the PTA who felt the need to be offended on his behalf...


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 2:01 am:
Well, it's not just any high school for the kids in the neighborhood. It is a school for the gifted. NYC has a few public schools like that.

While the school is for gifted kids from all over the area, it was named for a prominent Jewish educator. The neighborhood is predominantly Jewish. Brooklyn is always fair game for hate crimes against the Jewish population too. So people tend to be a bit more sensitive. Then there's the common thought that kids dress up for Halloween as people they idolize. Therefore, if he dressed as Hitler, he must be a white supremacist and have no respect for any of his classmates. Whereas, I just think he wanted to see if he could cause trouble and test the limits of the first amendment, in a country where that's all but been stripped away.

rm_CauseISaidSo 55F
182 posts
11/3/2006 4:16 pm

It's bad taste and bad judgment. Just as it was bad taste and bad judgement when Prince Harry decided to do it. Yes, it should have been an issue and I am glad they addressed it, and both boys absolutely deserved to get called on it.

It's one thing for Mel Brooks to dress people up as Nazis in a movie or on Broadway when he then provides opportunity after opportunity to depict said Nazis in various states of undignified and humiliating parody. It's another thing to go out in a straight costume trick or treating and kind of unimaginative, I think. It's about as creative and lazy as going for the pregnant nun look. This kid was clearly trying to shock but he puts no creativity into it. Why didn't he go as Joseph Mengele while he was at it? He could have brought along a friend and done fake experiments on him. That would have shown some thought. Or he could have dressed up as Jon Benet Ramsey. Complete with ropes. Take it a step further, he could have gone in a bloody military uniform with a missing arm and gone as an Iraq statistic.

If he wanted to shock and demonstrated some dark humor at the same without pissing people off perhaps he could have dressed himself and a black friend up as a Negro plantation owner and a white slave. Gone as Or as OJ's missing glove.

MissAnn, you bring out my seamiest side sometimes. Thanks for keeping me in touch with it, lol.


rm_CauseISaidSo 55F
182 posts
11/3/2006 4:20 pm

wow, I wish I could edit and take out that extraneous ""Or as". *shrug.* oh well.


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 2:02 am:
I wish your original comment had shown up.

NickRules999 46M
9458 posts
11/3/2006 6:42 pm

And to think, I used to compare every teacher I had in Utah to Nazis. I wonder, if I did that when going to Kaysville jr high, if I'd have been in trouble, not for my costume choice, but for impersonating the faculty?

One year, I dressed as King Diamond. Inverted cross and all. No one complained.

Come into my realm! You aren't afraid...are you?


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 2:05 am:
You know you would have gotten in trouble for impersonating faculty.

rm_CauseISaidSo 55F
182 posts
11/3/2006 6:56 pm

Well, A F F completely removed my beautifully sarcastic post. I basically said when Mel Brooks features the Third Reich, it is framed within a movie where there are plenty of scenes to showcase the Nazis as incompetent, gauche, undignified fools. The kid went out in a straight costume. Sarcasticaly, I said that not only was it bad judgment, it also showed about as much imagination as the old pregnant nun costume. I wonder if the post got banned for the part where I then facetiously suggested that while the student was at it, he might have gone as Jon Benet with the ropes still attached. Or as OJ's missing glove? Or as Joseph Mengele? Or my suggestion that maybe a reverse role black plantation owner-white slave might have gone over better?

My point was, he and Prince Harry exhibited bad taste and bad judgment and they each deservedly got called on it.


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 2:07 am:
Or how about dressed as Jesus Christ in the bible belt, complete with blood spurting from hands and feet?

I feel the Prince Harry thing was different. It wasn't a Hitler costume, it was a Rommel costume and given the theme of the party, it was appropriate. But photographers were there, so he got in trouble.

rm_teddybare426 66M
487 posts
11/3/2006 7:46 pm

Seems the kid got what he was really after.........attention.


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/4/2006 2:10 am:
I think that's it in a nutshell.

redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
11/6/2006 9:32 am

Kids do things in poor taste all the time. That is one way they learn. I like the idea of dressing as Halloween Hitler, because ridicule is one way humans show how ludicrous the enemy is. What Chaplin did in his movie. Hogan's Heroes and the Producers are just more sophisticated versions of the same impulse. Now real Nazis are scary!


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/6/2006 9:44 am:
Real Nazis are scary. But you're right. Ridicule is a way to take power away from such images. If Hitler were to be made a complete joke all these years later, it would take a lot of power away from Neo-Nazi groups, as they would come to be considered a joke too.

redmustang91 64M
9760 posts
11/6/2006 2:40 pm

When you laugh at someone and their pathetic posturing you take away their power. Why I enjoy the Daily Show and Bill Maher so much!


MissAnnThrope replies on 11/6/2006 6:11 pm:
Sadly, that isn't working for the current administration.

queenser 46M

2/21/2007 4:20 am

In Brooklyn, definitely an unwise choice of costume, but yes, sounds like characteristic overreaction on the part of Manhattan Beach's residents. Next year, some kid should dress up as Mel Gibson and see what reaction he produces.


Become a member to create a blog