Hookup, Find Sex or Meet Someone Hot Now

What if it takes you two hours to cum?  

hotdreamer1000 60M
9101 posts
3/30/2016 10:18 am

Last Read:
6/14/2016 3:29 am

What if it takes you two hours to cum?


I saw a dubious advert the other day. Yes, on one of my rare forays into the world of on line pornography, I admit it.

It said "One pill and my husband can't cum for two hours." It then goes on to explain how a man having taken this pill could fuck constantly for two hours before being able to orgasm.

Leaving aside the fact that perhaps this advert was aimed at wannabe male porn stars, I have queries about this.

Of course I know the heritage of these pharmaceuticals is probably dubious at best, and I am not looking for views on whether or not they might be good for your health. And before anyone misunderstands, I am not asking for advice as to whether I should try taking one or not, lol.

But that does bring me to my first query: Why on earth would I want to fuck for two hours and not be able to come? I fully understand that the ability, through self control, plenty of foreplay, innovative techniques etc., to make lovemaking last for hours is very desirable and I have been known to indulge in pretty long sessions at times. But two hours solid fucking I can not do, and wouldn't want to, medically assisted or not.

What I want to know, honestly, is would you, if you were my lover? Would you want that? Wouldn't that get boring, having a guy just hammering away for hours without being able to get off? Or is that actually an attractive fantasy - multiple orgasms and endlessly fucked till you can hardly walk the next day?

Maybe when I was twenty my back might have been up to it I suppose. I can't remember. I certainly wouldn't be now. Unless I was underneath of course.

I am normally a slow and sensuous kind of guy anyway, so I am probably not the best judge of this. Even now I still have a relatively quick recovery interval (though sadly not in the class it used to be, lol ) and I quite like it if I can be close to the edge a lot of the time, especially the first time. If we both are then all the better.

I don't think I would ever be tempted by Viagra, even if I needed it, but I can understand the principle. If you don't get as hard as you'd like any more, or not at all, then it must be a great help. I vaguely remember hearing something about "delay spray" when I was younger, and wondering if it might be a good idea. Then I learned how to interpret and be considerate of a woman's reactions and how not to want to dive straight in and get to the end as quickly as possible, and suddenly it didn't seem necessary at all any more. And I have never been with a woman who didn't absolutely love the feeling that she could get me off pretty much whenever she wanted to, if she wanted to.

So am I missing something here, or is it just one of those really stupid ads?

sexysixties2 72F  
38886 posts
3/30/2016 11:39 am

Whilst I find longer sessions far more preferable to quickies there is no way I want anyone simply fucking me for two hours....non stop....in and out???? No thanks I reckon my vagina would be red raw at the end of it so I'll pass....or rather any partner can damn well pass....I am not impressed!

"Age does not protect you from love, but love, to some extent, protects you from age."

~~Anais Nin~~


Han54boat 67M
11667 posts
3/30/2016 11:45 am

I wonder about it too. I would be too tired to cum after two hours. LOL.
I guess. It come down to finding the right person.


Cum to my blog and respond. Have a great kissing fun time.


marysia4u 64F
15362 posts
3/30/2016 2:22 pm

I don't like to rush things in the bedroom, but two hours is far too long. I would be saying to myself.............. for God's sake, hurry up and cum.


zandigal 55F
13002 posts
3/30/2016 6:36 pm

two hours!? Holy crap! no thank you lol
i would venture to say that advertisement was full of 'something'...


Respond to every call that excites Your Spirit
~Rumi


..


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
3/31/2016 3:23 am

    Quoting  :

Thanks for this very interesting response. I know long sessions can be great, and I have often had them too. But it was Sexysixties point about the non-stop in and out which the advert conjured up in my mind and which I couldn't get my head round. But of course as you say, each to his own. Although obviously not in this case, lol.


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
3/31/2016 3:25 am

    Quoting sexysixties2:
    Whilst I find longer sessions far more preferable to quickies there is no way I want anyone simply fucking me for two hours....non stop....in and out???? No thanks I reckon my vagina would be red raw at the end of it so I'll pass....or rather any partner can damn well pass....I am not impressed!
Ha ha! That's exactly what it conjured up in my mind - the non-stop in and out!


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
3/31/2016 3:27 am

    Quoting Han54boat:
    I wonder about it too. I would be too tired to cum after two hours. LOL.
    I guess. It come down to finding the right person.
Yup, right person - check
Good communication - check
Too tired after two hours - check, lol

Thanks for your input.


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
3/31/2016 3:29 am

    Quoting marysia4u:
    I don't like to rush things in the bedroom, but two hours is far too long. I would be saying to myself.............. for God's sake, hurry up and cum.


Actually, now you mention it, I remember a girlfriend of mine once complaining she'd had an ex who took forever to get there, and how she would often be satisfied after a while and end up lying there thinking "oh for heaven's sake how much longer?" Lol. Not a reaction I would like to be the cause of....


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
3/31/2016 3:30 am

    Quoting zandigal:
    two hours!? Holy crap! no thank you lol
    i would venture to say that advertisement was full of 'something'...

Ha ha haa....

I love you Zandi.


MyNameIsKay 58F  
11808 posts
3/31/2016 11:27 pm

When my X and I started having sex, he had little to no recovery time after cumming. He would be thrusting for a bit, cum, then keep going. That gift didn't last for the 20 years we were together, but he did tell me in those early days that he used to be able to hump for 3 hours...fortunately he never did that with me. Yes...boorrrring! Now in those early days I wasn't multi-orgasmic, so it would have been double boring. Today, I'd be able to occupy myself for much longer before it would become a tad droll...

Swim...Bike...Done


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
4/1/2016 2:07 am

    Quoting MyNameIsKay:
    When my X and I started having sex, he had little to no recovery time after cumming. He would be thrusting for a bit, cum, then keep going. That gift didn't last for the 20 years we were together, but he did tell me in those early days that he used to be able to hump for 3 hours...fortunately he never did that with me. Yes...boorrrring! Now in those early days I wasn't multi-orgasmic, so it would have been double boring. Today, I'd be able to occupy myself for much longer before it would become a tad droll...
Ahhh memories. Yes, when I was in my early twenties I occasionally experienced the "cum and keep going" phenomenon. I never kept it going for three hours though!

Later I learned a more restrained and varied approach, hopefully allowing for longer sessions without it becoming tedious!

I can't believe this post turned so serious. I was really just pissing about for a laugh when I wrote it. Seems like only Zandigal really reacted appropriately (lol still ) , although I think you pretty much got it too.

I'm smiling at the idea of you "occupying yourself."


stormyroses 36F
1628 posts
6/3/2016 4:29 pm

It's one of those things that appeals to men because it plays off of what men think women want. Sort of the same way things like Cosmo articles appeal to women because they play off of what women think men want. (Hint: neither of those things are actually what most men and most women want.)

One of my partners can easily go for an hour, and probably can go for two. He's essentially a human robot. His kink is giving pleasure, and he's not satisfied emotionally until his partner has been satisfied physically many times - I'm talking fifteen or twenty. Sometimes it's fun, but more often it's exhausting. It's also emotionally draining for me. I like to give pleasure too, and with this partner I'm denied that. I also get bored when sex always follows the same pattern. Sometimes I want it hard and fast, sometimes slow and sensuous. Sometimes I want it to last a long time and sometimes I want the satisfaction and the feeling of power I get when I make my partner come in ninety seconds. Sometimes I want sweet romance, sometimes I want it to be light and fun with lots of giggling, sometimes I want it rough and animal-like, sometimes I want deep intensity.

That's why he's only an occasional partner, I guess. I don't want sex to be monotonous.

To answer your question (would I want that?): not often. Once in a blue moon, maybe, if there were no medical contraindications. Even once in a blue moon, I might get tired of it. Sex is pretty physically demanding, at least in most positions.

Do not seek an external refuge, but be a light unto yourself.

"Be the change you want to see."

HalfNekkid Wednesday Peekaboo


hotdreamer1000 60M
11652 posts
6/6/2016 4:24 am

Once again, I could apply your words to me and find it all still applies! Plus I think once you have had one of those true equal give and take, switching between soft and slow, long and hard, quick and over excited, giving and receiving kinds of sexual relationships you don't get the same value from any other kind.


Become a member to create a blog